"Ozil or Odegaard: The Ultimate Arsenal Midfield Showdown"

⚡"By the Numbers: Would Özil Outperform Ødegaard in Arteta’s Arsenal?"

January 24, 2025

Key Themes:-

  1. Player Profiles and Styles:

    • Özil: A traditional No. 10 focused on creativity and vision.

    • Ødegaard: A modern advanced 8, blending creativity, goal-scoring, and defensive work rate.

  2. Statistical Comparison:

    • Özil excels in assists, key passes, and big chances created (e.g., 19 assists in 2015/16).

    • Ødegaard contributes more goals (15 in 2022/23) and defensive actions, aligning with modern midfield demands.

  3. Tactical Fit:

    • Özil’s creativity could help against deep-lying defenses but may disrupt Arsenal’s defensive shape.

    • Ødegaard’s high pressing and versatility suit Arteta’s system better.

  4. Hypothetical Simulation:

    • Özil in his prime might create more chances but could expose Arsenal defensively in transitions.

    • Ødegaard’s all-round contributions make him more balanced for the team.

  5. Core Debate:

    • Creativity vs. work rate: Can Özil’s brilliance outshine Ødegaard’s adaptability in Arteta’s fast-paced system?

    • Does modern football still have room for a traditional No. 10 like Özil?

  6. Comparative Lessons: Drawing insights from how each team navigated (or struggled to navigate) the transition from dominance to rebuild.

Comparing Mesut Özil and Martin Ødegaard in terms of their potential fit in a modern Arsenal team requires analyzing their respective styles, statistical contributions, and how their roles fit into the tactical structure. Let's break down the comparison by analysing Özil's historic performance as a No. 10 versus Ødegaard's impact in his advanced No. 8 role.

1. Player Profiles and Playing Styles

Mesut Özil:

  • Renowned as a traditional No. 10, Özil excelled at occupying spaces between the lines, threading through balls, and creating high-quality chances.

  • Özil's game revolved around finesse, vision, and minimal defensive contributions.

  • His peak years at Arsenal (2013-2018) were characterized by exceptional chance creation, leading the league in key passes and assists at his prime.

Martin Ødegaard:

  • A modern advanced midfielder who combines creative passing with high work rate and defensive contributions.

  • Ødegaard thrives in the half-spaces, frequently dropping deeper to assist in build-up while also pressing intensely off the ball.

  • His current role under Mikel Arteta demands versatility, transitioning seamlessly between an attacking creator and a midfield stabilizer.

A Tactical Mastermind: At the helm is Michel, Girona's seasoned manager. Renowned for his tactical versatility and attacking philosophy, Michel instilled a dynamic playing style that maximizes his players' strengths. Girona's 4-3-3 formation prioritizes high pressing, quick passing, and fluid movement, creating a potent attacking force that's both entertaining and effective. Players like Cristhian Stuani, the veteran striker, and the young midfield gem Aleix García, thrive in this system, contributing goals and creativity.

2. Key Statistical Comparison

Here’s how Özil’s best Arsenal season (2015/16) stacks up against Ødegaard's 2022/23 season, where he excelled in the advanced 8 role.

Metric

Özil (2015/16)

Ødegaard (2022/23)

Appearances

35

37

Goals

6

15

Assists

19

7

Key Passes per Game

4.2

2.5

Big Chances Created

28

12

Pass Completion (%): Final Third

86%

81%

Tackles per Game

0.9

1.2

Pressures per Game

7.1

19.8

Observations:

  1. Creativity: Özil was the more prolific chance creator, leading Arsenal’s attack with an unparalleled ability to unlock defenses. His assist numbers and key passes highlight his dominance in this area.

  2. Goal Scoring: Ødegaard has outshined Özil in terms of goal-scoring, reflecting Arteta’s system, which encourages attacking midfielders to make late runs into the box.

  3. Defensive Contributions: Ødegaard is significantly more active off the ball, contributing to Arsenal’s high-pressing system, while Özil was often criticized for his lack of defensive engagement.

  4. Positional Play: While Özil operated exclusively in central areas, Ødegaard covers more ground, contributing to both midfield build-up and defensive structure.

3. Tactical Fit in Arteta’s Arsenal

Ødegaard’s Current Role:

  • Ødegaard’s role as an advanced 8 aligns with Arteta’s high-tempo, possession-based system, which demands pressing intensity and positional versatility.

  • His ability to drift into wide areas and link up with wingers like Bukayo Saka adds fluidity to Arsenal’s attack.

  • Ødegaard’s work rate ensures defensive balance, crucial when Arsenal’s fullbacks push high.

Özil’s Potential in the No. 10 Role:

  • Özil would thrive in a system built to dominate possession, as seen in the peak Wenger years. However, Arteta’s team often prioritizes energy and pressing over pure creativity.

  • His lack of pressing would leave Arsenal vulnerable in transitions, especially against high-intensity Premier League opponents.

  • Özil’s central positioning might hinder Arsenal’s current fluid attacking dynamics, which depend on midfielders interchanging positions.

4. Hypothetical Analysis: Özil vs. Ødegaard

If Özil were to play in Arteta’s system, his creativity would undoubtedly enhance Arsenal’s ability to unlock low blocks. However:

  1. Chance Creation vs. Ball Progression: While Özil offers more in terms of pure creativity, Ødegaard’s ability to progress the ball and contribute defensively is better suited to Arteta’s tactics.

  2. Goal Threat: Ødegaard’s higher goal-scoring ability fits Arsenal’s current reliance on midfielders to share the scoring burden.

  3. Defensive Structure: Özil’s low defensive output would disrupt Arsenal’s compact shape, making Ødegaard a more balanced choice.

5. Statistical Simulation: Özil in Arteta’s Arsenal

Using Özil’s 2015/16 numbers and Arsenal’s current goal-scoring patterns:

  • Arsenal would likely create more chances with Özil in the No. 10 role, especially against teams that sit deep.

  • However, their pressing efficiency and defensive transitions would suffer, potentially leading to more goals conceded.

🎯 Conclusion:

While Özil’s playmaking ability would add an extra dimension to Arsenal’s creativity, Ødegaard is a better fit for Arteta’s system due to his all-around game. Modern football demands players who excel in multiple phases of play, and Ødegaard’s blend of creativity, defensive work rate, and positional intelligence makes him indispensable in this Arsenal team.

Thus, Özil’s brilliance might shine individually, but Ødegaard’s contributions better align with Arteta’s collective ethos, making him the more effective option in this setup.

🏟️Snippets from Row Z

  • Pursuit of Benjamin Šeško: Arsenal is actively seeking to strengthen their attacking options and has shown renewed interest in RB Leipzig's striker Benjamin Šeško. The club has made initial inquiries, but a mid-season transfer remains challenging due to Leipzig's reluctance to sell and the player's agent ruling out a loan move.

  • Interest in Matheus Cunha: The Gunners are reportedly considering a move for Wolves' forward Matheus Cunha to bolster their attacking lineup. However, they face competition from Nottingham Forest, who are also keen on the Brazilian striker.

  • Mikel Arteta's Call for Reinforcements: Arsenal's manager, Mikel Arteta, has emphasized the urgent need for new signings in the January transfer window, especially in light of injuries to key players like Bukayo Saka and Gabriel Jesus. He has urged the club's board to invest in players who can make an immediate impact as they aim to close the gap in the Premier League title race.

💡Have a story or analysis you want us to research that we could feature? Send us an email or DM. If we go with your plan, you'll see your name in the credits.